PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCAX vs. TIBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCAX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 17.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LTCAX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 1.20%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.


LTCAX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.69%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
1.20%

TIBAX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.61%
YTD
17.56%
6M
19.01%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTCAX
Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund
0.69%5.72%1.84%3.72%-4.60%-0.41%1.92%3.32%0.62%2.05%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
17.56%36.62%13.23%18.01%-7.95%20.08%-0.67%17.72%-4.54%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCAX and TIBAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2002

-0.06

The correlation between LTCAX and TIBAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTCAX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCAX
LTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTCAXTIBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.84

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

6.85

-4.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

26.19

-20.30

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCAX and TIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCAX drawdown since its inception was -7.38%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCAX and TIBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCAXTIBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-49.12%

+41.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-5.43%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.33%

-9.20%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.32%

-20.94%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.38%

-34.85%

+27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.30%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-5.98%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

1.42%

-0.67%

Volatility

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) is 0.55%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that LTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTCAXTIBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

2.89%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

7.31%

-5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

8.75%

-7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.39%

11.15%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.29%

13.46%

-11.17%

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTCAX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

LTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than TIBAX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTCAX
Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund
2.98%3.96%3.38%1.99%1.43%1.13%1.24%1.65%1.64%1.37%1.30%1.36%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.93%5.64%5.44%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTCAX and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBAX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to LTCAX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCAX dropped -7.38% vs TIBAX's -49.12%.

TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTCAX and TIBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer