LTCAX vs. FGNSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTCAX (Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund) and FGNSX (Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LTCAX returned 1.35%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for FGNSX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTCAX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FGNSX.

Performance

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCAX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than FGNSX's 0.77% return.

LTCAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: 3.71%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 1.24%

FGNSX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 2.68%
• 3Y*: 3.24%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTCAX Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund	0.69%	5.72%	1.84%	3.72%	-4.60%	-0.41%	1.92%	3.32%	0.62%	0.12%
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund	0.77%	3.08%	3.47%	3.56%	-0.36%	0.14%	1.04%	2.11%	1.47%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCAX and FGNSX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017	0.46

The correlation between LTCAX and FGNSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LTCAX vs. FGNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCAX

LTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FGNSX

FGNSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FGNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FGNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FGNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FGNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) and Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTCAX	FGNSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	3.10	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.68	7.76	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	2.91	-1.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	6.42	-4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	28.84	-22.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the FGNSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCAX and FGNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTCAX	FGNSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	3.10	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	1.06	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.11	-0.34

Drawdowns

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCAX drawdown since its inception was -7.38%, which is greater than FGNSX's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCAX and FGNSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCAX	FGNSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-2.35%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.21%	-0.50%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.33%	-2.35%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.32%	-2.35%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-0.25%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.92%	-0.20%

Volatility

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTCAX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) at 0.41%. This indicates that LTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTCAX	FGNSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.41%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	0.70%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71%	1.03%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.39%	2.06%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.29%	1.65%	+0.64%

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FGNSX's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCAX vs. FGNSX - Dividend Comparison

LTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than FGNSX's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund	2.34%	2.63%	3.31%	2.57%	0.84%	0.34%	0.83%	1.79%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTCAX Thornburg California Limited Term Municipal Fund	2.98%	3.96%	3.38%	1.99%	1.43%	1.13%	1.24%	1.65%	1.64%	1.37%	1.30%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCAX and FGNSX in my portfolio?

LTCAX and FGNSX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTCAX or FGNSX?

LTCAX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to FGNSX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCAX dropped -7.38% vs FGNSX's -2.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.