LTAX vs. IBMO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LTAX (Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. LTAX is actively managed, while IBMO is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTAX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.

Performance

LTAX vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF (LTAX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTAX

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 2.79%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTAX vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF	2.07%
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LTAX and IBMO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

LTAX vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBMO

IBMO Risk / Return Rank: 86
IBMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IBMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IBMO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IBMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IBMO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTAX vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF (LTAX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTAX	IBMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.33	—

Drawdowns

LTAX vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTAX drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTAX and IBMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTAX	IBMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-14.77%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.01%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-2.31%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTAX	IBMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	1.10%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.76%	2.14%	+3.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.76%	4.50%	+1.26%

LTAX vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTAX vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison

LTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than IBMO's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.39%	2.37%	2.15%	1.65%	0.89%	0.62%	1.03%	1.01%
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTAX and IBMO in my portfolio?

LTAX and IBMO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTAX or IBMO?

On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTAX or IBMO?

IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for LTAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTAX or IBMO?

IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.33% for LTAX.

What is the main difference between LTAX and IBMO?

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for LTAX and 0.18% for IBMO.