PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVQX vs. MMEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than MMEYX's 30.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed MMEYX with an annualized return of 8.88%, while MMEYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.


LSVQX

1D
0.86%
1M
3.25%
YTD
13.77%
6M
13.52%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
8.88%

MMEYX

1D
1.64%
1M
6.43%
YTD
30.40%
6M
30.27%
1Y
54.98%
3Y*
25.62%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
13.77%7.31%4.23%19.02%-6.24%34.54%-5.98%20.59%-17.41%6.12%
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
30.40%14.25%11.36%14.83%-12.01%37.20%-1.34%21.60%-16.10%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVQX and MMEYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2013

0.95

The correlation between LSVQX and MMEYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVQX vs. MMEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVQX
LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MMEYX
MMEYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MMEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MMEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSVQXMMEYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

3.00

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

4.06

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

7.12

-3.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.35

21.87

-11.53

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the MMEYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVQX and MMEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSVQXMMEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

3.00

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.49

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.50

-0.10

Drawdowns

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, smaller than the maximum MMEYX drawdown of -69.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and MMEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVQXMMEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.77%

-69.05%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.19%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-25.23%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-26.82%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.77%

-54.35%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-15.57%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.66%

+0.20%

Volatility

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 4.26%, while Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVQXMMEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.33%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

12.97%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

19.41%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

22.37%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.30%

25.39%

-1.09%

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than MMEYX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVQX vs. MMEYX - Dividend Comparison

LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, less than MMEYX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
7.14%8.13%1.78%4.73%2.02%1.45%1.83%2.04%7.00%4.78%2.35%3.59%
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
7.43%9.68%8.36%1.33%8.53%4.34%0.00%2.17%14.87%10.31%3.73%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LSVQX and MMEYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMEYX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to LSVQX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs MMEYX's -69.05%.

MMEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVQX and MMEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer