PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVQX vs. LVAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than LVAGX's 24.67% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed LVAGX with an annualized return of 9.14%, while LVAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.


LSVQX

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.52%
6M
16.34%
YTD
21.19%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.14%
ALL TIME*
9.45%

LVAGX

1D
1.08%
1M
2.10%
6M
18.79%
YTD
24.67%
1Y
43.05%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
21.19%7.31%4.23%19.02%-6.24%34.54%-5.98%20.59%-17.41%6.12%
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
24.67%26.84%6.86%18.76%-8.44%21.07%0.15%21.99%-15.70%21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVQX and LVAGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.86

The correlation between LSVQX and LVAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVQX vs. LVAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSVQX
LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAGX
LVAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSVQXLVAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.56

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.83

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

21.28

-10.14

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the LVAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVQX and LVAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, which is greater than LVAGX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and LVAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVQXLVAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.77%

-42.32%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-7.03%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-16.13%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-23.77%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.77%

-42.32%

-12.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.46%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-6.95%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

1.92%

+0.84%

Volatility

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) at 3.31%. This indicates that LSVQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVQXLVAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.31%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

10.57%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

13.24%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

15.37%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

16.83%

+7.40%

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAGX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVQX vs. LVAGX - Dividend Comparison

LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than LVAGX's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
6.70%8.13%1.78%4.73%2.02%1.45%1.83%2.04%7.00%4.78%2.35%3.59%
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
5.12%6.38%2.44%2.69%1.52%2.04%1.66%1.99%4.71%1.86%2.54%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSVQX and LVAGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSVQX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to LVAGX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs LVAGX's -42.32%.

LVAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVQX and LVAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer