LSVD vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSVD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by LSV, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. LSVD is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, LSVD returned 37.36% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

LSVD

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 13.72%
• 1Y: 37.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	14.66%	22.29%	-2.62%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and ISCMF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	-0.01

Return for Risk

LSVD vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 90
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSVD	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	1.76	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	3.18	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	2.31	-0.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	5.53	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.34	11.85	+8.49

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVD	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-25.42%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-5.69%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-5.26%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-13.35%	+10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	2.65%	-0.81%

Volatility

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is 4.77%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that LSVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVD	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	5.11%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	15.45%	-5.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	17.84%	-4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	14.29%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	14.29%	+3.35%

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVD vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.28%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVD and ISCMF in my portfolio?

LSVD and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVD or ISCMF?

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to LSVD (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, LSVD or ISCMF?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 37.36% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LSVD has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSVD or ISCMF?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 31.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSVD or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSVD or ISCMF?

LSVD has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between LSVD and ISCMF?

LSVD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: LSV and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.