LST vs. LOGO
LST (Leuthold Select Industries ETF) and LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LST returned 36.12% vs 4.09% for LOGO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LST charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for LOGO.
Performance
LST vs. LOGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LST achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than LOGO's 0.33% return.
LST
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOGO
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LST vs. LOGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 17.68% | 16.95% |
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | 0.33% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LST and LOGO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LST and LOGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LST vs. LOGO — Risk / Return Rank
LST
LOGO
LST vs. LOGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LST | LOGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.06 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 0.22 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 0.56 | +13.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LST | LOGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.26 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.36 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
LST vs. LOGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LST drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, which is greater than LOGO's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LST and LOGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LST | LOGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.47% | -18.34% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -18.34% | +7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.48% | +6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -5.76% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 7.37% | -4.76% |
Volatility
LST vs. LOGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) is 4.02%, while Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that LST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LST | LOGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 8.32% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 12.93% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 15.77% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 15.68% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 15.68% | +2.24% |
LST vs. LOGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LST has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
LST vs. LOGO - Dividend Comparison
LST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while LOGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LST and LOGO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOGO has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to LST (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LST dropped -19.47% vs LOGO's -18.34%.
On 1-year performance, LST leads with 36.12% vs 4.09% for LOGO. On fees, LST is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LST has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 36.12% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LST is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for LOGO.
LST has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for LOGO.
They also come from different issuers: Leuthold Group and Alpha Brands. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LST and 0.69% for LOGO.
LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LST and LOGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer