LSSIX vs. SSCPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSSIX (Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund) and SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX returned 12.78%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for SSCPX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSSIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for SSCPX.

Performance

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSIX achieves a 23.20% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX has outperformed SSCPX with an annualized return of 12.78%, while SSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.

LSSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 8.25%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 32.70%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

SSCPX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 23.90%
• 1Y: 40.72%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 12.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund	23.20%	3.57%	14.94%	11.92%	-22.93%	9.91%	34.15%	26.59%	0.18%	26.85%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	27.15%	6.41%	10.79%	15.16%	-17.56%	24.53%	25.39%	23.71%	-16.14%	15.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSIX and SSCPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996	0.86

The correlation between LSSIX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LSSIX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSIX

LSSIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
LSSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LSSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LSSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LSSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LSSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SSCPX

SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSSIX	SSCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.09	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.88	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	3.67	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.44	12.49	+0.94

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSIX and SSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSIX drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, which is greater than SSCPX's maximum drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSIX and SSCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSSIX	SSCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.41%	-53.65%	-29.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-11.54%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-27.78%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.42%	-27.78%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.52%	-43.59%	+5.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.44%	-10.23%	-24.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	3.39%	-0.66%

Volatility

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSSIX	SSCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	6.15%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	15.17%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.03%	20.28%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.47%	22.22%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.81%	23.05%	-0.24%

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSSIX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison

LSSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, less than SSCPX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund	6.19%	7.62%	3.64%	2.34%	3.02%	20.23%	1.76%	8.86%	11.30%	12.61%	0.00%	7.91%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	7.09%	9.02%	11.37%	0.00%	10.18%	24.67%	0.02%	0.00%	17.42%	0.00%	0.00%	58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSSIX and SSCPX in my portfolio?

LSSIX and SSCPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSSIX or SSCPX?

SSCPX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to LSSIX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSIX dropped -83.41% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.