PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSIX vs. RFIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSSIX having a 16.24% return and RFIMX slightly lower at 15.87%.


LSSIX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.17%
YTD
16.24%
6M
15.19%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
11.72%

RFIMX

1D
1.19%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.87%
6M
13.94%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LSSIX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund
16.24%3.57%14.94%11.92%-22.93%9.91%34.15%26.59%-0.64%
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
15.87%1.99%11.52%9.14%-24.26%30.58%44.44%24.94%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSIX and RFIMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018

0.86

The correlation between LSSIX and RFIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSIX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSIX
LSSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LSSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RFIMX
RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSSIXRFIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.20

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

9.02

+2.37

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the RFIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSIX and RFIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSSIXRFIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.53

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.00

+0.30

Drawdowns

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSIX drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSIX and RFIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSIXRFIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.41%

-99.41%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-9.11%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-99.41%

+71.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.42%

-99.41%

+61.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-99.12%

+98.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-29.26%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.23%

-0.51%

Volatility

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) is 5.41%, while Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that LSSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSIXRFIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

5.79%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

13.68%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

19.11%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

5,369.96%

-5,347.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

4,402.70%

-4,379.93%

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSIX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison

LSSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than RFIMX's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSIX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund
6.56%7.62%3.64%2.34%3.02%20.23%1.76%8.86%11.30%12.61%0.00%7.91%
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
1.14%1.33%0.00%0.77%47.82%71.79%0.00%0.00%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSIX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFIMX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to LSSIX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSIX dropped -83.41% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.

LSSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSIX and RFIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer