PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSPX.L returned 19.22%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for XEWG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XEWG.L.

Performance

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LSPX.L is traded in GBp, while XEWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XEWG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPX.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than XEWG.L's 8.81% return.

LSPX.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.54%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
16.37%

XEWG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.81%
6M
10.01%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		10.61%9.48%27.64%20.51%-9.65%3.07%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		8.81%11.07%11.66%11.87%-14.07%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPX.L and XEWG.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.62

The correlation between LSPX.L and XEWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LSPX.L
XEWG.L

Technology

35.6%
18.3%

Financial Services

11.8%
14.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
10.9%

Industrials

8.3%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.5%

Energy

3.5%
4.6%

Utilities

2.4%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.1%

Technology

LSPX.L
35.6%
XEWG.L
18.3%

Financial Services

LSPX.L
11.8%
XEWG.L
14.4%

Communication Services

LSPX.L
11.2%
XEWG.L
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPX.L
10.1%
XEWG.L
10.3%

Healthcare

LSPX.L
8.5%
XEWG.L
10.9%

Industrials

LSPX.L
8.3%
XEWG.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

LSPX.L
4.9%
XEWG.L
6.5%

Energy

LSPX.L
3.5%
XEWG.L
4.6%

Utilities

LSPX.L
2.4%
XEWG.L
6.1%

Real Estate

LSPX.L
1.9%
XEWG.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

LSPX.L
1.8%
XEWG.L
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged

Often compared with LSPX.L:
LSPX.L vs. VUAG.LLSPX.L vs. CSP1.LLSPX.L vs. XSTC.LLSPX.L vs. SPYLSPX.L vs. SPXP.LLSPX.L vs. VOOLSPX.L vs. VERG.L
Often compared with XEWG.L:
XEWG.L vs. IUMS.LXEWG.L vs. XDEQ.LXEWG.L vs. IDUS.LXEWG.L vs. XDPP.LXEWG.L vs. XS2D.LXEWG.L vs. S5EE.LXEWG.L vs. PQVM.L

Return for Risk

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LSPX.L
LSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LSPX.LXEWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.80
1.81

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.72
2.76

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.32

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

2.82

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

9.95

+4.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPX.L and XEWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LSPX.LXEWG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.81

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.37

+0.92

Drawdowns

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than XEWG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and XEWG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LSPX.LXEWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-22.61%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.85%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.10%

-18.42%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-6.89%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.94%

+0.06%

Volatility

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LSPX.LXEWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.58%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

7.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

10.70%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

16.55%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.55%

+0.50%

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XEWG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSPX.L vs. XEWG.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than XEWG.L's 1.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		0.91%1.00%1.27%1.02%2.06%1.10%1.53%1.70%1.97%1.72%1.87%1.96%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		1.19%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

LSPX.L and XEWG.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.30% for XEWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and XEWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer