LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L).
LSPX.L and CSP1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Dec 9, 2014. CSP1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both LSPX.L and CSP1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LSPX.L or CSP1.L.
Correlation
The correlation between LSPX.L and CSP1.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LSPX.L:
1.97
CSP1.L:
1.95
LSPX.L:
2.81
CSP1.L:
2.77
LSPX.L:
1.38
CSP1.L:
1.37
LSPX.L:
3.59
CSP1.L:
3.62
LSPX.L:
14.09
CSP1.L:
13.93
LSPX.L:
1.63%
CSP1.L:
1.63%
LSPX.L:
11.61%
CSP1.L:
11.63%
LSPX.L:
-25.47%
CSP1.L:
-25.48%
LSPX.L:
-1.85%
CSP1.L:
-1.91%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSPX.L having a 2.64% return and CSP1.L slightly lower at 2.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSPX.L having a 15.47% annualized return and CSP1.L not far behind at 15.23%.
LSPX.L
2.64%
-1.51%
13.64%
22.97%
15.15%
15.47%
CSP1.L
2.63%
-1.53%
13.50%
22.71%
14.94%
15.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LSPX.L
CSP1.L
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 1.23% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.05% | 1.10% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.93% | 1.73% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.16% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and CSP1.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LSPX.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.