PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LSPX.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPX.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 0.46% return.


LSPX.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.54%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
16.37%

IUCM.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
0.46%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
10.61%9.48%27.64%20.51%-9.65%30.18%15.43%29.10%-12.48%
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
2.02%17.47%41.41%47.96%-33.47%23.51%19.04%25.86%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPX.L and IUCM.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.73

The correlation between LSPX.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSPX.L
IUCM.L

Technology

35.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%
99.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

LSPX.L
35.6%
IUCM.L
0.6%

Financial Services

LSPX.L
11.8%
IUCM.L

-

Communication Services

LSPX.L
11.2%
IUCM.L
99.1%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPX.L
10.1%
IUCM.L

-

Healthcare

LSPX.L
8.5%
IUCM.L

-

Industrials

LSPX.L
8.3%
IUCM.L

-

Consumer Defensive

LSPX.L
4.9%
IUCM.L

-

Energy

LSPX.L
3.5%
IUCM.L

-

Utilities

LSPX.L
2.4%
IUCM.L

-

Real Estate

LSPX.L
1.9%
IUCM.L

-

Basic Materials

LSPX.L
1.8%
IUCM.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSPX.L
LSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSPX.LIUCM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.24

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

2.45

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

8.05

+6.61

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPX.L and IUCM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.40

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.63

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.70

+0.59

Drawdowns

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and IUCM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-38.32%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-8.21%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.10%

-20.74%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-38.32%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-5.85%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-8.23%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.50%

-0.50%

Volatility

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) is 2.58%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that LSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

4.25%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

10.40%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

14.35%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

19.48%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

20.24%

-3.19%

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
0.91%1.00%1.27%1.02%2.06%1.10%1.53%1.70%1.97%1.72%1.87%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSPX.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUCM.L.

LSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and IUCM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer