LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L
LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSPX.L returned 15.13%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for IUCM.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCM.L.
Performance
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPX.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPX.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 0.46% return.
LSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
IUCM.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.61% | 9.48% | 27.64% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 30.18% | 15.43% | 29.10% | -12.48% |
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.02% | 17.47% | 41.41% | 47.96% | -33.47% | 23.51% | 19.04% | 25.86% | -8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPX.L and IUCM.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between LSPX.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
Financial Services
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Communication Services
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
Consumer Cyclical
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Healthcare
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Industrials
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Energy
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Utilities
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Real Estate
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Basic Materials
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPX.L
IUCM.L
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.24 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 2.45 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 8.05 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 1.40 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.63 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and IUCM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -38.32% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -8.21% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.10% | -20.74% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | -38.32% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -5.85% | +5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -8.23% | +4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.50% | -0.50% |
Volatility
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) is 2.58%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that LSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 4.25% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 10.40% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 14.35% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 19.48% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 20.24% | -3.19% |
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.06% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.87% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPX.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUCM.L.
LSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and IUCM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer