PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - LSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi. LSPX.L is passively managed, while CSH2.L is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPX.L returned 16.37%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for CSH2.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSH2.L.

Performance

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPX.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LSPX.L has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 16.37%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.

LSPX.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.54%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
16.37%

CSH2.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		10.61%9.48%27.64%20.51%-9.65%30.18%15.43%29.10%-2.11%10.31%
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP		1.74%4.67%5.61%4.72%1.54%0.13%0.30%0.82%0.70%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPX.L and CSH2.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2015

-0.01

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LSPX.L
CSH2.L

Technology

35.6%
35.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.3%

Industrials

8.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
1.4%

Utilities

2.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.0%

Technology

LSPX.L
35.6%
CSH2.L
35.9%

Financial Services

LSPX.L
11.8%
CSH2.L
10.4%

Communication Services

LSPX.L
11.2%
CSH2.L
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPX.L
10.1%
CSH2.L
13.9%

Healthcare

LSPX.L
8.5%
CSH2.L
11.3%

Industrials

LSPX.L
8.3%
CSH2.L
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

LSPX.L
4.9%
CSH2.L
4.9%

Energy

LSPX.L
3.5%
CSH2.L
1.4%

Utilities

LSPX.L
2.4%
CSH2.L
1.1%

Real Estate

LSPX.L
1.9%
CSH2.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

LSPX.L
1.8%
CSH2.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD

Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP

Often compared with LSPX.L:
LSPX.L vs. VUAG.LLSPX.L vs. CSP1.LLSPX.L vs. XSTC.LLSPX.L vs. SPYLSPX.L vs. SPXP.LLSPX.L vs. VOOLSPX.L vs. VERG.L
Often compared with CSH2.L:
CSH2.L vs. ERNS.LCSH2.L vs. MINV.LCSH2.L vs. BILSCSH2.L vs. ERNA.LCSH2.L vs. TI5G.LCSH2.L vs. LCSIXCSH2.L vs. AAPL

Return for Risk

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LSPX.L
LSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LSPX.LCSH2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.80
8.05

-5.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.72
15.06

-11.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

4.37

-2.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

27.66

-23.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

159.04

-144.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 8.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPX.L and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LSPX.LCSH2.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

8.05

-5.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

6.49

-5.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

4.68

-3.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

4.62

-3.32

Drawdowns

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and CSH2.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LSPX.LCSH2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-0.37%

-25.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-0.16%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.10%

-0.29%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-0.29%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

-0.37%

-25.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-0.00%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

0.03%

+1.97%

Volatility

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that LSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LSPX.LCSH2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

0.08%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

0.25%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

0.54%

+9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

0.56%

+13.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

0.44%

+16.61%

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LSPX.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		0.91%1.00%1.27%1.02%2.06%1.10%1.53%1.70%1.97%1.72%1.87%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

LSPX.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPX.L.

LSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while CSH2.L is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and CSH2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer