LSPD.TO vs. FTS
LSPD.TO (Lightspeed Commerce Inc.) and FTS (Fortis Inc) are both stocks. LSPD.TO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FTS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, LSPD.TO returned -31.68%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for FTS. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPD.TO is traded in CAD, while FTS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPD.TO achieves a -22.04% return, which is significantly lower than FTS's 8.42% return.
LSPD.TO
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -22.04%
- 6M
- -18.45%
- 1Y
- -14.67%
- 3Y*
- -13.76%
- 5Y*
- -31.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FTS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPD.TO Lightspeed Commerce Inc. | -22.04% | -24.45% | -21.21% | 43.77% | -62.12% | -43.14% | 149.07% | 90.85% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 8.42% | 23.67% | 14.90% | 5.01% | -7.54% | 21.62% | 0.19% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPD.TO and FTS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2019 | -0.00 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LSPD.TO and FTS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Fundamentals
LSPD.TO:
CA$1.80B
FTS:
$27.81B
LSPD.TO:
-CA$1.02
FTS:
$3.40
LSPD.TO:
1.49
FTS:
2.37
LSPD.TO:
1.21
FTS:
1.22
LSPD.TO:
CA$1.23B
FTS:
$12.22B
LSPD.TO:
CA$451.31M
FTS:
$7.44B
LSPD.TO:
CA$15.44M
FTS:
$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPD.TO vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
LSPD.TO
FTS
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPD.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.25 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.99 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 7.08 | -7.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPD.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 1.41 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | 0.76 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.67 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPD.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPD.TO and FTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPD.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -28.25% | -64.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.25% | -6.17% | -33.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.90% | -11.31% | -48.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.97% | -24.12% | -68.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.88% | -4.38% | -87.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.87% | -5.48% | -55.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.86% | 2.69% | +19.17% |
Volatility
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.79%. This indicates that LSPD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPD.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.91% | 4.79% | +10.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.25% | 10.39% | +17.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.02% | 13.08% | +28.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.38% | 14.58% | +44.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.63% | 16.98% | +50.65% |
Dividends
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
LSPD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.36% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% |
LSPD.TO Lightspeed Commerce Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lightspeed Commerce Inc. and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSPD.TO vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
LSPD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. reported a gross profit of 89.90M and revenue of 286.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
LSPD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. reported an operating income of -33.41M and revenue of 286.03M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.7%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
LSPD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. reported a net income of -28.10M and revenue of 286.03M, resulting in a net margin of -9.8%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPD.TO and FTS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LSPD.TO and FTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer