PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LSMC.DE is traded in EUR, while RBOT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RBOT.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT.TO's 9.64% return.


LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
16.45%
YTD
63.83%
6M
64.57%
1Y
130.64%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%

RBOT.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.03%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.33%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%-34.66%37.56%23.03%39.73%-5.73%-0.86%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF
9.64%0.16%11.06%35.71%-44.50%17.00%38.69%37.92%-28.96%-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.54

The correlation between LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSMC.DERBOT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.17

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.37

1.22

+9.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.83

3.97

+28.86

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSMC.DERBOT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

0.93

+3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

-0.03

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.17

+0.65

Drawdowns

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum RBOT.TO drawdown of -53.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSMC.DERBOT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-53.83%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-17.78%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.22%

-33.37%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.77%

-53.83%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-17.27%

+13.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-22.40%

+13.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

5.45%

-1.49%

Volatility

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) at 7.73%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSMC.DERBOT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.23%

7.73%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

17.58%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.40%

23.38%

+7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.21%

26.80%

+4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.06%

26.91%

-0.85%

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RBOT.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSMC.DE vs. RBOT.TO - Dividend Comparison

LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF
0.12%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while RBOT.TO is Robotics. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and RBOT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer