LSMC.DE vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSMC.DE returned 37.13%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for QQQM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LSMC.DE is traded in EUR, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 69.50% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 22.88% return.

LSMC.DE

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 25.20%
• YTD: 69.50%
• 6M: 71.23%
• 1Y: 137.68%
• 3Y*: 63.28%
• 5Y*: 37.13%
• 10Y*: 28.96%

QQQM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 11.49%
• YTD: 22.88%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 39.19%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	69.50%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	37.56%	11.76%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	22.85%	6.51%	33.98%	50.36%	-28.34%	36.98%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMC.DE and QQQM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.52

The correlation between LSMC.DE and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 95
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSMC.DE	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.54	2.44	+2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.83	3.10	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.43	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.92	3.58	+7.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.64	11.22	+23.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.54, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMC.DE and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSMC.DE	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.54	2.44	+2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.18	0.88	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.87	-0.05

Drawdowns

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSMC.DE	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.77%	-30.95%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-10.99%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.22%	-27.16%	-9.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.77%	-30.95%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-7.34%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.50%	+0.46%

Volatility

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 3.68%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSMC.DE	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	3.68%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.85%	11.45%	+10.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.33%	16.16%	+14.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.17%	21.90%	+9.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.04%	21.72%	+4.32%

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSMC.DE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSMC.DE and QQQM in my portfolio?

LSMC.DE and QQQM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSMC.DE or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSMC.DE or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

What is the main difference between LSMC.DE and QQQM?

LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.15% for QQQM.