LSIOX vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
LSIOX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Apr 12, 2004. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIOX Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund | -0.85% | 9.31% | 9.95% | 10.81% | -12.85% | 4.32% | 9.25% | 13.01% | -2.08% | 8.40% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSIOX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LSIOX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 5.93%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.83% annualized return.
LSIOX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSIOX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSIOX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
LSIOX
PRCPX
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSIOX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 3.47 | -1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 5.52 | -3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.93 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 4.53 | -2.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 21.08 | -12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSIOX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.47 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.23 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSIOX and PRCPX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
LSIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, less than PRCPX's 12.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIOX Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund | 6.71% | 6.39% | 7.34% | 7.31% | 7.32% | 9.02% | 5.58% | 5.62% | 7.50% | 5.64% | 6.03% | 6.18% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSIOX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum PRCPX drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIOX and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSIOX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -23.07% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.61% | -3.03% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.13% | -14.34% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.94% | -23.07% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.74% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -3.16% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.65% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LSIOX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) is 1.04%, while T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that LSIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSIOX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 1.10% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 2.52% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63% | 4.11% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 4.79% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 5.45% | +0.27% |