LSIGX vs. MCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX).
LSIGX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 1994. MCFIX is managed by Mercer Funds. It was launched on Aug 15, 2005.
Performance
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund | -1.06% | 7.15% | 3.14% | 8.01% | -11.98% | 0.80% | 7.18% | 4.01% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -1.10% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSIGX having a -1.06% return and MCFIX slightly lower at -1.10%.
LSIGX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
MCFIX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSIGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSIGX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
LSIGX
MCFIX
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSIGX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.82 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.20 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.46 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 4.26 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSIGX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.82 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.03 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.14 | +1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSIGX and MCFIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison
LSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than MCFIX's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund | 4.61% | 4.76% | 4.69% | 4.06% | 4.14% | 5.95% | 6.24% | 2.59% | 3.42% | 4.27% | 4.32% | 3.81% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.31% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSIGX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, roughly equal to the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIGX and MCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSIGX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -21.68% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -3.09% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.98% | -18.72% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -6.08% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -8.61% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.06% | -0.11% |
Volatility
LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSIGX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.54% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.77% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66% | 4.82% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 6.01% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 6.16% | -1.49% |