LSIGX vs. MCFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSIGX (Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund) and MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, LSIGX returned 1.34%/yr vs -0.03%/yr for MCFIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSIGX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MCFIX.

Performance

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSIGX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -1.10% return.

LSIGX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

MCFIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: -1.10%
• 6M: -1.02%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund	0.09%	7.15%	3.14%	8.01%	-11.98%	0.80%	7.18%	4.01%
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund	-1.10%	6.64%	2.02%	6.47%	-13.69%	-1.05%	4.75%	3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LSIGX and MCFIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.79

The correlation between LSIGX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSIGX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSIGX

LSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 29
LSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
LSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MCFIX

MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 10
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSIGX	MCFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	0.89	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.31	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.16	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	0.98	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	2.80	+2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the MCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSIGX and MCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSIGX	MCFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	0.89	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	-0.00	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.14	+1.01

Drawdowns

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSIGX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, roughly equal to the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIGX and MCFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSIGX	MCFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.94%	-21.68%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.22%	-3.75%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.42%	-6.32%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.98%	-18.72%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-6.08%	+4.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-8.54%	+6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	1.27%	-0.03%

Volatility

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSIGX	MCFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.32%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	2.77%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	4.12%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.25%	6.04%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	6.12%	-1.44%

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSIGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSIGX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison

LSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than MCFIX's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund	4.72%	4.76%	4.69%	4.06%	4.14%	5.95%	6.24%	2.59%	3.42%	4.27%	4.32%	3.81%
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund	4.31%	3.89%	4.54%	3.68%	3.31%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSIGX and MCFIX in my portfolio?

LSIGX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSIGX or MCFIX?

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to LSIGX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIGX dropped -20.94% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.