LSHIX vs. FHYSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX).
LSHIX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Jun 5, 1996. FHYSX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 24, 2008.
Performance
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHIX Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund | -1.05% | 9.25% | 9.43% | 10.00% | -11.68% | 8.23% | 3.46% | 10.55% | -3.55% | 8.41% |
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | -1.76% | 9.14% | 6.42% | 12.77% | -13.16% | 4.49% | 6.08% | 15.14% | -2.16% | 8.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSHIX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's -1.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSHIX having a 5.61% annualized return and FHYSX not far behind at 5.39%.
LSHIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 6.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
FHYSX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSHIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSHIX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank
LSHIX
FHYSX
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSHIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.67 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.37 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.36 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 9.71 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSHIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.67 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.60 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.85 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSHIX and FHYSX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison
LSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, which matches FHYSX's 5.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHIX Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund | 5.83% | 5.77% | 7.72% | 6.28% | 4.96% | 6.09% | 5.14% | 6.75% | 7.52% | 5.97% | 6.06% | 10.99% |
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 5.82% | 6.28% | 5.84% | 5.30% | 5.27% | 4.54% | 5.74% | 6.18% | 6.61% | 6.98% | 6.45% | 8.45% |
Drawdowns
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.26%, which is greater than FHYSX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHIX and FHYSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSHIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.26% | -21.45% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.91% | -2.50% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -16.93% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.13% | -21.45% | -2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.27% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -2.61% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.61% | +0.38% |
Volatility
LSHIX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) at 1.24%. This indicates that LSHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSHIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.24% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 2.37% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 3.76% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 5.20% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 5.76% | +0.40% |