LSFIX vs. LSSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX).
LSFIX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Jan 16, 1995. LSSCX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 13, 1991.
Performance
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFIX Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund | -1.09% | 9.10% | 5.39% | 8.21% | -11.74% | 2.89% | 5.38% | 13.56% | -3.07% | 8.40% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 5.31% | 10.89% | 19.39% | -11.52% | 29.03% | 2.29% | 25.06% | -16.81% | 10.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSFIX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than LSSCX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LSFIX has underperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 4.13%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.
LSFIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
LSSCX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSFIX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSFIX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank
LSFIX
LSSCX
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSFIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.57 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 0.98 | +1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.13 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 0.08 | +2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 0.25 | +10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSFIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.57 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.32 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.40 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSFIX and LSSCX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison
LSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than LSSCX's 17.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFIX Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund | 4.75% | 4.70% | 5.79% | 4.41% | 1.53% | 6.23% | 6.23% | 4.24% | 5.62% | 5.62% | 3.57% | 6.77% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 17.37% | 17.50% | 10.71% | 20.30% | 12.74% | 19.01% | 8.04% | 8.65% | 17.43% | 12.58% | 8.27% | 11.35% |
Drawdowns
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSFIX drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFIX and LSSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSFIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -54.28% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -14.43% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | -25.10% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.60% | -44.65% | +25.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -9.89% | +7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -7.61% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 6.62% | -5.95% |
Volatility
LSFIX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) is 1.44%, while Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that LSFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSFIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 4.56% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 12.70% | -10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 24.85% | -20.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 20.90% | -16.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 22.37% | -17.43% |