LSGSX vs. FSPWX
LSGSX (Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund) and FSPWX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past year, LSGSX returned 3.77% vs 5.38% for FSPWX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSGSX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FSPWX.
Performance
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than FSPWX's 1.83% return.
LSGSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
FSPWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 1.24% | 5.66% | -1.48% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 1.83% | 6.76% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGSX and FSPWX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between LSGSX and FSPWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGSX vs. FSPWX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGSX
FSPWX
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.56 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 2.39 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.67 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | 8.19 | -5.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.56 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.00 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGSX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than FSPWX's maximum drawdown of -3.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGSX and FSPWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -3.84% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -1.95% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | 0.00% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -0.98% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.64% | +0.60% |
Volatility
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) have volatilities of 0.94% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGSX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 0.92% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.28% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 3.35% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.30% | 4.06% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 4.06% | +1.54% |
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPWX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGSX vs. FSPWX - Dividend Comparison
LSGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FSPWX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.19% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 2.65% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.88% | 8.23% | 5.60% | 0.99% | 1.96% | 2.90% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGSX and FSPWX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGSX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to FSPWX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGSX dropped -17.20% vs FSPWX's -3.84%.
FSPWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGSX and FSPWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer