PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSGSX vs. EARRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGSX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than EARRX's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGSX has underperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.57% annualized return.


LSGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.63%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
0.09%
1Y
1.02%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.33%
10Y*
2.36%
ALL TIME*
4.75%

EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
0.64%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
3.57%
ALL TIME*
2.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
0.09%5.66%1.80%3.63%-12.50%5.01%13.97%8.63%-2.23%3.61%
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.14%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGSX and EARRX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.59

The correlation between LSGSX and EARRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSGSX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSGSX
LSGSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LSGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSGSXEARRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.28

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.22

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

6.95

-6.00

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGSX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGSX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGSX and EARRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSGSXEARRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-10.27%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-0.98%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-1.18%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.23%

-6.39%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.23%

-10.27%

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-0.53%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-1.08%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.31%

+0.73%

Volatility

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.44%. This indicates that LSGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSGSXEARRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.44%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.31%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

1.63%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

2.78%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

2.72%

+2.87%

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSGSX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

LSGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than EARRX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
5.03%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
3.83%3.53%3.52%3.88%8.23%5.60%0.99%1.96%2.90%2.38%1.48%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSGSX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSGSX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to EARRX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGSX dropped -17.20% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSGSX and EARRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer