Correlation
The correlation between LSGRX and FBGRX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
LSGRX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
LSGRX is managed by Natixis Funds. It was launched on May 16, 1991. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LSGRX or FBGRX.
Performance
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
LSGRX:
0.91
FBGRX:
0.42
LSGRX:
1.26
FBGRX:
0.68
LSGRX:
1.17
FBGRX:
1.09
LSGRX:
0.87
FBGRX:
0.37
LSGRX:
2.90
FBGRX:
1.13
LSGRX:
7.02%
FBGRX:
8.83%
LSGRX:
25.51%
FBGRX:
28.42%
LSGRX:
-63.63%
FBGRX:
-58.02%
LSGRX:
-4.13%
FBGRX:
-8.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.77%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.86% annualized return.
LSGRX
0.88%
8.87%
1.34%
22.42%
24.18%
16.90%
15.77%
FBGRX
-3.61%
8.83%
-2.33%
12.20%
21.83%
18.42%
16.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LSGRX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LSGRX
FBGRX
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than FBGRX's 6.17% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 5.62% | 5.67% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% | 0.68% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 6.17% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.28% | 4.05% | 5.30% | 5.96% |
Drawdowns
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and FBGRX.
Loading data...
Volatility
LSGRX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) is 5.93%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that LSGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...