LSGR vs. SCFIX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) and SCFIX (Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund) are both funds - LSGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Natixis, while SCFIX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Shenkman Funds. Over the past year, LSGR returned 7.07% vs 5.23% for SCFIX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSGR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for SCFIX.

Performance

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's 1.42% return.

LSGR

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -7.20%
• YTD: -4.33%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCFIX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 6.61%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	-4.33%	15.32%	38.52%	12.46%
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	1.42%	7.02%	6.11%	4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGR and SCFIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.42

Return for Risk

LSGR vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 15
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

SCFIX

SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 96
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSGR	SCFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	3.13	-2.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	5.14	-4.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.76	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	4.62	-4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	24.75	-23.66

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the SCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGR and SCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and SCFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGR	SCFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-13.08%	-9.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.13%	-1.11%	-17.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.36%	0.00%	-7.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-0.51%	-3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	0.21%	+5.55%

Volatility

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that LSGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSGR	SCFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	0.48%	+4.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	1.30%	+11.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.73%	1.64%	+15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.41%	2.77%	+17.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	3.28%	+17.13%

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSGR vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison

LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	5.32%	5.54%	5.85%	5.21%	3.86%	4.93%	3.24%	3.78%	3.87%	3.09%	3.07%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGR and SCFIX in my portfolio?

LSGR and SCFIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSGR or SCFIX?

LSGR has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SCFIX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGR dropped -22.92% vs SCFIX's -13.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.