PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSFYX vs. RSFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSFYX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than RSFYX's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LSFYX has underperformed RSFYX with an annualized return of 3.99%, while RSFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.56% annualized return.


LSFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
6M
1.75%
YTD
1.79%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
3.99%
ALL TIME*
4.60%

RSFYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.76%
6M
2.90%
YTD
2.83%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
4.56%
ALL TIME*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
1.79%4.80%8.60%9.78%-5.52%4.88%1.47%5.43%0.40%5.06%
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
2.83%7.09%8.64%7.48%-6.82%4.12%4.96%9.68%0.69%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LSFYX and RSFYX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between LSFYX and RSFYX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSFYX vs. RSFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSFYX
LSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RSFYX
RSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSFYXRSFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.37

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

13.69

-5.23

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the RSFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSFYX and RSFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSFYX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, roughly equal to the maximum RSFYX drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFYX and RSFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSFYXRSFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-21.42%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-1.23%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-2.76%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.60%

-8.82%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.67%

-21.42%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.89%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-1.33%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.43%

0.00%

Volatility

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) is 0.31%, while Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that LSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSFYXRSFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.53%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

3.16%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

3.98%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.01%

3.60%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.21%

-0.72%

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSFYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RSFYX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSFYX vs. RSFYX - Dividend Comparison

LSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than RSFYX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
7.24%7.09%9.23%6.81%5.17%3.87%5.18%6.46%6.07%5.67%5.89%6.23%
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
6.58%9.39%9.01%8.22%6.22%4.16%5.47%6.07%5.93%5.07%4.99%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSFYX and RSFYX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSFYX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to LSFYX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSFYX dropped -20.67% vs RSFYX's -21.42%.

LSFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSFYX and RSFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer