LSFIX vs. LSGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) and Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX).
LSFIX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Jan 16, 1995. LSGSX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 19, 1991.
Performance
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFIX Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund | -1.09% | 9.10% | 5.39% | 8.21% | -11.74% | 2.89% | 5.38% | 13.56% | -3.07% | 8.40% |
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | -0.21% | 5.66% | 1.80% | 3.63% | -12.50% | 5.01% | 13.97% | 8.63% | -2.23% | 3.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSFIX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than LSGSX's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LSFIX has outperformed LSGSX with an annualized return of 4.13%, while LSGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
LSFIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
LSGSX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSFIX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGSX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSFIX vs. LSGSX — Risk / Return Rank
LSFIX
LSGSX
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) and Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSFIX | LSGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.58 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 0.81 | +1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.11 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.39 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 3.88 | +6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSFIX | LSGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.58 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.13 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.46 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.75 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSFIX and LSGSX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Dividend Comparison
LSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than LSGSX's 2.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFIX Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund | 4.75% | 4.70% | 5.79% | 4.41% | 1.53% | 6.23% | 6.23% | 4.24% | 5.62% | 5.62% | 3.57% | 6.77% |
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 2.69% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.88% | 8.23% | 5.60% | 0.99% | 1.96% | 2.90% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSFIX drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than LSGSX's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFIX and LSGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSFIX | LSGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -17.20% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -3.36% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | -15.23% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.60% | -15.23% | -4.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -3.46% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -4.60% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.20% | -0.53% |
Volatility
LSFIX vs. LSGSX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) at 1.29%. This indicates that LSFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSFIX | LSGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.29% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 2.81% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 4.98% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 6.31% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 5.62% | -0.68% |