LSEQ vs. EBIT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) and EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSEQ is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Harbor, while EBIT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index. LSEQ is actively managed, while EBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, LSEQ returned 28.44% vs 28.99% for EBIT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSEQ charges 1.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EBIT.

Performance

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEQ achieves a 27.48% return, which is significantly higher than EBIT's 17.82% return.

LSEQ

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 27.48%
• 6M: 25.69%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBIT

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	27.48%	4.13%	-3.58%
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	17.82%	6.85%	9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LSEQ and EBIT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024	0.18

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSEQ	EBIT
Technology	21.1%	7.7%
Basic Materials	17.5%	4.4%
Healthcare	15.9%	4.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	14.4%
Communication Services	9.3%	3.6%
Industrials	9.2%	14.2%
Energy	7.0%	11.9%
Utilities	4.1%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	3.1%
Financial Services	0.6%	25.8%
Real Estate	-	7.7%

Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. EBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

EBIT

EBIT Risk / Return Rank: 63
EBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSEQ	EBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.69	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.54	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	3.49	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	10.02	+2.09

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the EBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEQ and EBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum EBIT drawdown of -26.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and EBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSEQ	EBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.35%	-26.64%	+18.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.40%	-8.34%	+0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	0.00%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-6.37%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	2.90%	-0.54%

Volatility

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) at 4.19%. This indicates that LSEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSEQ	EBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	4.19%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	10.84%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	17.21%	-1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	21.09%	-6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	21.09%	-6.63%

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIT's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSEQ vs. EBIT - Dividend Comparison

LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than EBIT's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	1.69%	2.00%	2.40%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	1.73%	2.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSEQ and EBIT in my portfolio?

LSEQ and EBIT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSEQ or EBIT?

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to EBIT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEQ dropped -8.35% vs EBIT's -26.64%.

Which ETF is better, LSEQ or EBIT?

On 1-year performance, EBIT leads with 28.99% vs 28.44% for LSEQ. On fees, EBIT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EBIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSEQ or EBIT?

Over the 1-year period, EBIT has performed better with a 28.99% return vs 28.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSEQ or EBIT?

EBIT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSEQ or EBIT?

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.69% for EBIT.

What is the main difference between LSEQ and EBIT?

LSEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while EBIT is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.70% for LSEQ and 0.29% for EBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.