PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCIX vs. DHEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCIX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than DHEAX's 1.65% return.


LSCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

DHEAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.83%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
0.67%5.73%4.84%4.78%-4.20%0.17%2.76%4.99%1.62%0.15%
DHEAX
Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund
1.65%5.70%9.15%8.38%-3.57%2.42%2.87%4.44%2.88%2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCIX and DHEAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017

0.58

The correlation between LSCIX and DHEAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCIX vs. DHEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCIX
LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DHEAX
DHEAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DHEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DHEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSCIXDHEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.47

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

10.05

-7.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

43.99

-32.60

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the DHEAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCIX and DHEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSCIXDHEAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

4.52

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

2.80

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.76

-0.66

Drawdowns

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCIX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum DHEAX drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCIX and DHEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCIXDHEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-12.34%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-0.50%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-0.50%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-5.06%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.80%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.11%

+0.25%

Volatility

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX) at 0.26%. This indicates that LSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCIXDHEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.26%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

0.74%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

1.11%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

1.52%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

2.27%

-0.16%

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DHEAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSCIX vs. DHEAX - Dividend Comparison

LSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than DHEAX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHEAX
Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund
5.64%5.27%5.94%5.25%3.41%2.31%2.92%3.76%3.45%3.20%
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.61%4.08%2.32%1.92%2.49%3.22%3.35%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSCIX and DHEAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCIX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to DHEAX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCIX dropped -7.31% vs DHEAX's -12.34%.

DHEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCIX and DHEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer