PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCIX vs. ALAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCIX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than ALAFX's 17.77% return.


LSCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

ALAFX

1D
0.99%
1M
10.45%
YTD
17.77%
6M
17.16%
1Y
52.91%
3Y*
41.84%
5Y*
20.67%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
0.67%5.73%4.84%4.78%-4.20%0.17%2.76%4.99%1.62%0.15%
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
17.77%39.65%51.72%44.15%-35.95%20.00%45.73%33.84%1.33%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCIX and ALAFX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCIX vs. ALAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCIX
LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAFX
ALAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ALAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSCIXALAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

2.57

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

3.22

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.41

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.09

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

10.53

+1.99

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the ALAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCIX and ALAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSCIXALAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.57

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.79

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.90

+0.20

Drawdowns

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCIX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum ALAFX drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCIX and ALAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCIXALAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-43.65%

+36.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-17.58%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-26.96%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-43.65%

+37.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-7.69%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

5.16%

-4.80%

Volatility

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) is 0.69%, while Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that LSCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCIXALAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

4.92%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

16.02%

-14.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

21.40%

-19.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

26.17%

-23.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

23.99%

-21.88%

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ALAFX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSCIX vs. ALAFX - Dividend Comparison

LSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than ALAFX's 6.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
6.72%7.91%0.00%0.10%0.06%14.09%6.28%1.98%5.41%0.00%
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.61%4.08%2.32%1.92%2.49%3.22%3.35%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSCIX and ALAFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAFX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to LSCIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCIX dropped -7.31% vs ALAFX's -43.65%.

ALAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCIX and ALAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer