LSBDX vs. BINC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC).

LSBDX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 15, 1991. BINC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 19, 2023.

Performance

LSBDX vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSBDX vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund	-1.54%	8.67%	6.70%	6.73%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	-0.78%	7.57%	5.76%	7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's -0.78% return.

LSBDX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: -1.54%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: 2.44%
• 10Y*: 3.45%

BINC

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSBDX vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

LSBDX

Loomis Sayles Bond Fund

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Return for Risk

LSBDX vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSBDX

LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 84
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSBDX vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSBDX	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.74	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.29	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	1.91	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	7.93	+1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSBDX vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSBDX and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSBDX	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.74	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	2.28	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between LSBDX and BINC is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LSBDX vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than BINC's 5.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund	3.90%	4.15%	5.51%	5.09%	5.13%	2.88%	3.83%	3.97%	3.78%	5.86%	3.13%	7.37%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.91%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LSBDX vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSBDX	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.58%	-2.69%	-27.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-2.69%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-2.14%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-0.33%	-2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.65%	+0.03%

Volatility

LSBDX vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.25%. This indicates that LSBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSBDX	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.25%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.20%	1.69%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	2.94%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.97%	3.03%	+1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.89%	3.03%	+1.86%