LRSCX vs. RYPNX
LRSCX (Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund) and RYPNX (Royce Opportunity Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX returned 7.42%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for RYPNX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LRSCX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for RYPNX.
Performance
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRSCX achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly lower than RYPNX's 23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX has underperformed RYPNX with an annualized return of 7.42%, while RYPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.
LRSCX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 24.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.63%
RYPNX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 42.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund | 17.90% | 0.61% | 12.66% | 19.81% | -17.48% | 26.24% | -1.49% | 20.41% | -11.90% | 6.49% |
RYPNX Royce Opportunity Fund | 23.58% | 11.95% | 10.20% | 19.72% | -17.19% | 30.34% | 26.52% | 28.24% | -20.10% | 21.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRSCX and RYPNX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LRSCX and RYPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRSCX vs. RYPNX — Risk / Return Rank
LRSCX
RYPNX
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRSCX | RYPNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.18 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 11.32 | -5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, smaller than the maximum RYPNX drawdown of -69.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRSCX and RYPNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRSCX | RYPNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -69.31% | +15.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -12.01% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -30.23% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -30.77% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.25% | -50.61% | +0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -7.72% | +6.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -10.63% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.37% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) is 3.86%, while Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that LRSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRSCX | RYPNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 5.66% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 15.64% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 22.22% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 24.27% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 25.32% | -2.02% |
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRSCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RYPNX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRSCX vs. RYPNX - Dividend Comparison
LRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than RYPNX's 7.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund | 5.66% | 6.68% | 11.06% | 0.12% | 3.79% | 17.08% | 1.06% | 19.56% | 20.44% | 14.33% | 14.14% | 24.30% |
RYPNX Royce Opportunity Fund | 7.79% | 9.63% | 7.95% | 4.52% | 5.12% | 22.51% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 10.21% | 14.91% | 6.89% | 10.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRSCX and RYPNX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYPNX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to LRSCX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRSCX dropped -54.02% vs RYPNX's -69.31%.
RYPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRSCX and RYPNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer