PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRND vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRND vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRND achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 11.31% return.


LRND

1D
-1.16%
1M
7.42%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.46%
1Y
34.53%
3Y*
23.71%
5Y*
10Y*

TOLZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.51%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRND vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
11.98%20.31%21.68%44.13%-19.33%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.31%14.76%11.67%6.18%-3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LRND and TOLZ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between LRND and TOLZ has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LRND vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LRND
TOLZ

Technology

57.8%
0.4%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Healthcare

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
0.8%

Industrials

5.5%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
2.0%

Energy

-

35.4%

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Utilities

-

22.2%

Technology

LRND
57.8%
TOLZ
0.4%

Communication Services

LRND
15.8%
TOLZ

-

Healthcare

LRND
10.1%
TOLZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

LRND
8.1%
TOLZ
0.8%

Industrials

LRND
5.5%
TOLZ
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

LRND
1.9%
TOLZ
4.5%

Basic Materials

LRND
0.9%
TOLZ

-

Financial Services

LRND
0.0%
TOLZ
2.0%

Energy

LRND

-

TOLZ
35.4%

Real Estate

LRND

-

TOLZ
8.0%

Utilities

LRND

-

TOLZ
22.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRND vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRND
LRND Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRND vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRNDTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.71

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

8.20

+1.81

LRND vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRND Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRND and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRNDTOLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.36

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.41

+0.40

Drawdowns

LRND vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNDTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-39.33%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.83%

-5.18%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-11.94%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-3.13%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-6.63%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.71%

+1.75%

Volatility

LRND vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.37%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNDTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.37%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

8.20%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

10.29%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

13.99%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

16.29%

+3.70%

LRND vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRND vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
0.49%0.67%0.97%1.22%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.66%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRND and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRND has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to TOLZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 23.71% vs 14.17% for TOLZ. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 14.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.49% for LRND.

LRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 0.46% for TOLZ.

LRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRND and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer