PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRND vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRND vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRND achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.28% return.


LRND

1D
-1.16%
1M
7.42%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.46%
1Y
34.53%
3Y*
23.71%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRND vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
11.98%20.31%21.68%44.13%-19.33%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LRND and SCHB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022

0.94

The correlation between LRND and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRND vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LRND
SCHB

Technology

57.8%
34.4%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.1%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.1%

Industrials

5.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.9%
2.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
12.2%

Energy

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

LRND
57.8%
SCHB
34.4%

Communication Services

LRND
15.8%
SCHB
10.1%

Healthcare

LRND
10.1%
SCHB
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LRND
8.1%
SCHB
10.1%

Industrials

LRND
5.5%
SCHB
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

LRND
1.9%
SCHB
4.6%

Basic Materials

LRND
0.9%
SCHB
2.0%

Financial Services

LRND
0.0%
SCHB
12.2%

Energy

LRND

-

SCHB
3.7%

Real Estate

LRND

-

SCHB
2.4%

Utilities

LRND

-

SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRND vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRND
LRND Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRND vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRNDSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.17

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

14.55

-4.53

LRND vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRND Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRND and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRNDSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.83

-0.02

Drawdowns

LRND vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNDSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-35.27%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.83%

-8.91%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-19.34%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.72%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-4.12%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.94%

+1.52%

Volatility

LRND vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNDSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.01%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

9.14%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

12.12%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

17.24%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

18.32%

+1.67%

LRND vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LRND vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
0.49%0.67%0.97%1.22%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LRND and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LRND has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 23.71% vs 22.11% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 22.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for LRND.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.49% for LRND.

LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRND and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer