LRN vs. SAABY
LRN (Stride, Inc.) and SAABY (Saab AB (publ)) are both stocks. LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while SAABY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, LRN returned 26.27%/yr vs 50.73%/yr for SAABY. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRN vs. SAABY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly higher than SAABY's -4.59% return.
LRN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- -31.79%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
SAABY
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 60.00%
- 5Y*
- 50.73%
- 10Y*
- —
LRN vs. SAABY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 50.49% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | -2.26% |
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | -4.59% | 177.56% | 39.85% | 47.07% | 67.28% | -48.79% | 82.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRN and SAABY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
LRN:
$4.65B
SAABY:
$29.87B
LRN:
$9.68
SAABY:
SEK 5.98
LRN:
10.10
SAABY:
43.63
LRN:
0.25
SAABY:
1.33
LRN:
1.86
SAABY:
3.43
LRN:
2.83
SAABY:
6.32
LRN:
$2.54B
SAABY:
SEK 82.29B
LRN:
$972.24M
SAABY:
SEK 17.87B
LRN:
$424.60M
SAABY:
SEK 9.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRN vs. SAABY — Risk / Return Rank
LRN
SAABY
LRN vs. SAABY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRN | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.46 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 1.14 | -1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRN vs. SAABY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, which is greater than SAABY's maximum drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and SAABY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRN | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.41% | -52.75% | -28.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.07% | -37.04% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.07% | -37.04% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.07% | -37.04% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.46% | -31.92% | -10.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -16.96% | -19.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.11% | 15.01% | +27.10% |
Volatility
LRN vs. SAABY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stride, Inc. (LRN) is 8.21%, while Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that LRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAABY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRN | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 15.37% | -7.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.17% | 33.13% | -8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.70% | 47.86% | +18.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 47.05% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 57.50% | -8.28% |
Dividends
LRN vs. SAABY - Dividend Comparison
LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 1.24% | 2.19% |
Financials
LRN vs. SAABY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Saab AB (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRN vs. SAABY - Profitability Comparison
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
SAABY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
SAABY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
SAABY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRN and SAABY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAABY has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to LRN (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs SAABY's -52.75%.
SAABY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRN and SAABY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer