LRGG vs. ITOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT).
LRGG and ITOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGG is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on May 14, 2024. ITOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2004.
Performance
LRGG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRGG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF | -13.21% | 7.65% | 8.81% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | -3.31% | 17.00% | 11.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGG achieves a -13.21% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's -3.31% return.
LRGG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -13.21%
- 6M
- -14.49%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 18.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRGG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRGG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
LRGG
ITOT
LRGG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.00 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 1.52 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.53 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 7.25 | -7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.00 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.54 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGG and ITOT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LRGG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ITOT's 1.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF | 0.18% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.12% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
LRGG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGG drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGG and ITOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -55.20% | +36.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.94% | -12.34% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.04% | -5.51% | -10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -7.02% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.98% | 2.61% | +3.37% |
Volatility
LRGG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRGG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 5.49% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 9.78% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.29% | 18.68% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 17.36% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 18.25% | -1.38% |