LRGC vs. HYFI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) and HYFI (AB High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while HYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LRGC returned 23.67% vs 7.81% for HYFI. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRGC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYFI.

Performance

LRGC vs. HYFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than HYFI's 1.95% return.

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYFI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 7.81%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGC vs. HYFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	16.23%	24.92%	9.30%
HYFI AB High Yield ETF	1.95%	8.91%	7.98%	6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and HYFI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.58

The correlation between LRGC and HYFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGC vs. HYFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGC	HYFI
Technology	34.0%	-
Communication Services	13.2%	80.8%
Financial Services	12.9%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Healthcare	8.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	19.0%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Energy	2.8%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

LRGC vs. HYFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

HYFI

HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 65
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. HYFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGC	HYFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.99	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.08	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	3.15	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	14.18	-4.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGC vs. HYFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HYFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and HYFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGC	HYFI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.99	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.70	-0.25

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. HYFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than HYFI's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and HYFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGC	HYFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.38%	-6.34%	-13.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-2.49%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.24%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-0.51%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	0.55%	+1.85%

Volatility

LRGC vs. HYFI - Volatility Comparison

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) at 1.09%. This indicates that LRGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGC	HYFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	1.09%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	3.10%	+5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	3.95%	+7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	5.36%	+9.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	5.36%	+9.84%

LRGC vs. HYFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HYFI's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGC vs. HYFI - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HYFI's 6.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HYFI AB High Yield ETF	6.64%	6.66%	6.57%	4.17%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGC and HYFI in my portfolio?

LRGC and HYFI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGC or HYFI?

LRGC has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to HYFI (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGC dropped -19.38% vs HYFI's -6.34%.

Which ETF is better, LRGC or HYFI?

On 1-year performance, LRGC leads with 23.67% vs 7.81% for HYFI. On fees, HYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGC or HYFI?

Over the 1-year period, LRGC has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGC or HYFI?

HYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LRGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGC or HYFI?

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.54% for LRGC.

What is the main difference between LRGC and HYFI?

LRGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HYFI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LRGC and 0.40% for HYFI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.