LRGC vs. DDTL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) and DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRGC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDTL.

Performance

LRGC vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than DDTL's 4.57% return.

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DDTL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 6M: 5.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGC vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	9.40%
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July	4.57%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and DDTL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

LRGC vs. DDTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGC	DDTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGC	DDTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	2.27	-0.83

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and DDTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGC	DDTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.38%	-3.78%	-15.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-0.40%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRGC	DDTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	5.46%	+6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	5.46%	+9.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	5.46%	+9.74%

LRGC vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGC vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGC and DDTL in my portfolio?

LRGC and DDTL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRGC or DDTL?

On fees, LRGC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGC or DDTL?

LRGC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGC or DDTL?

LRGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

What is the main difference between LRGC and DDTL?

LRGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LRGC and 0.79% for DDTL.