PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.


LRCU

1D
11.16%
1M
63.66%
YTD
216.82%
6M
265.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.01%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.58%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and XTJL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRCU vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCUXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.83

0.65

+12.18

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-23.24%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-4.05%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

LRCU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.64%

7.43%

+102.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.64%

15.23%

+94.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.64%

15.23%

+94.41%

LRCU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRCU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

LRCU and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.79% for XTJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer