LRCU vs. SMU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

LRCU vs. SMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly higher than SMU's -40.92% return.

LRCU

• 1D: 11.16%
• 1M: 63.66%
• YTD: 216.82%
• 6M: 265.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMU

• 1D: 16.25%
• 1M: 20.86%
• YTD: -40.92%
• 6M: -69.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	216.82%	162.61%
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-40.92%	-88.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and SMU is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRCU	SMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	12.83	-0.48	+13.31

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum SMU drawdown of -98.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and SMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	SMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-98.68%	+58.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.50%	+97.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-75.78%	+66.35%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	SMU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.64%	203.03%	-93.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.64%	203.03%	-93.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.64%	203.03%	-93.39%

LRCU vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LRCU and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

LRCU vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and SMU in my portfolio?

LRCU and SMU have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or SMU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or SMU?

LRCU and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or SMU?

LRCU and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.