LRCU vs. NBIG
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
LRCU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 526.74% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- -18.44%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 254.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 51.57%
- YTD
- 526.74%
- 6M
- 438.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 270.56% | 21.10% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 526.74% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and NBIG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -75.83% | +35.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -7.58% | -10.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -40.71% | +31.46% |
Volatility
LRCU vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.41% | 199.11% | -82.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 199.11% | -82.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 199.11% | -82.70% |
LRCU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
LRCU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer