LRCU vs. MUU
Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU).
LRCU and MUU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRCU is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. MUU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Oct 9, 2024.
Performance
LRCU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRCU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 48.62% | 162.61% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 41.27% | 360.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 48.62% return, which is significantly higher than MUU's 41.27% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 7.79%
- 1M
- -12.02%
- YTD
- 48.62%
- 6M
- 97.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- 17.77%
- 1M
- -25.73%
- YTD
- 41.27%
- 6M
- 205.92%
- 1Y
- 904.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRCU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
MUU
LRCU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.42 | 1.77 | +5.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and MUU is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LRCU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 3.42% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and MUU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -75.07% | +34.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.64% | -38.92% | +12.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -25.08% | +15.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.71% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 47.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 99.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.26% | 130.64% | -20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.26% | 127.68% | -17.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.26% | 127.68% | -17.42% |