PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 929.51% return.


LRCU

1D
11.16%
1M
63.66%
YTD
216.82%
6M
265.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
5.32%
1M
249.29%
YTD
929.51%
6M
1,310.65%
1Y
6,847.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
216.82%162.61%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
929.51%360.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and MUU is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRCU vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCUMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.83

6.58

+6.25

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-75.07%

+34.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-23.50%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

Volatility

LRCU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.64%

131.89%

-22.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.64%

133.83%

-24.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.64%

133.83%

-24.19%

LRCU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRCU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


PositionTTM20252024
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.47%4.27%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and MUU have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 1.06% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer