LRCU vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LRCU is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

LRCU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LRCU

• 1D: -18.44%
• 1M: 38.68%
• YTD: 270.56%
• 6M: 254.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -26.28%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	-10.70%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	-12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and MUU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-26.28%	-13.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.44%	-26.28%	+7.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-10.19%	+0.94%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	116.41%	295.32%	-178.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.41%	295.32%	-178.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.41%	295.32%	-178.91%

LRCU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and MUU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, LRCU and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or MUU?

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or MUU?

LRCU and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LRCU and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 1.01% for MUU.