LRCU vs. MULL
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
LRCU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 11.16%
- 1M
- 63.66%
- YTD
- 216.82%
- 6M
- 265.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- 246.94%
- YTD
- 907.48%
- 6M
- 1,268.17%
- 1Y
- 6,388.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 216.82% | 162.61% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 907.48% | 347.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and MULL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
MULL
LRCU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 49.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.83 | 7.34 | +5.49 |
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -72.29% | +32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -20.67% | +11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.64% | 132.53% | -22.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.64% | 136.39% | -26.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.64% | 136.39% | -26.75% |
LRCU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and MULL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer