LRCU vs. MULL
Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL).
LRCU and MULL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRCU is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. MULL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Nov 11, 2024.
Performance
LRCU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRCU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 37.88% | 162.61% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 18.59% | 347.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 37.88% return, which is significantly higher than MULL's 18.59% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 13.60%
- 1M
- -20.24%
- YTD
- 37.88%
- 6M
- 107.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 9.98%
- 1M
- -37.16%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 194.62%
- 1Y
- 734.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRCU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
MULL
LRCU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.56 | 1.62 | +4.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and MULL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LRCU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.33% | 0.39% |
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and MULL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -72.29% | +32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.94% | -48.41% | +16.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -21.94% | +12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.76% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 47.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 98.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.29% | 129.87% | -19.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.29% | 129.40% | -19.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.29% | 129.40% | -19.11% |