LRCU vs. INTW
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
LRCU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 176.12% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 394.65% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- -11.59%
- 1M
- -25.01%
- 6M
- 68.82%
- YTD
- 176.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -12.15%
- 1M
- -36.39%
- 6M
- 254.55%
- YTD
- 394.65%
- 1Y
- 897.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 176.12% | 172.36% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 394.65% | 105.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and INTW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
LRCU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 18.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 40.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -60.58% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.32% | -49.09% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -29.56% | +19.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.57% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 124.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.45% | 153.39% | -29.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.45% | 149.42% | -25.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.45% | 149.42% | -25.97% |
LRCU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and INTW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
LRCU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer