LRCU vs. HIDE
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and HIDE (Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while HIDE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HIDE.
Performance
LRCU vs. HIDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly higher than HIDE's 5.08% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 245.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. HIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 270.56% | 172.36% |
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF | 5.08% | 2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and HIDE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. HIDE — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIDE
LRCU vs. HIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | HIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. HIDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than HIDE's maximum drawdown of -5.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and HIDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | HIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -5.15% | -34.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -3.31% | -15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -0.96% | -8.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. HIDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | HIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.15% | 4.62% | +111.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.15% | 4.29% | +111.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.15% | 4.29% | +111.86% |
LRCU vs. HIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. HIDE - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF | 3.01% | 3.16% | 2.86% | 3.90% | 6.25% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and HIDE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIDE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIDE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
HIDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HIDE is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.29% for HIDE.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and HIDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer