LRCU vs. DIG
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LRCU is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
LRCU vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly higher than DIG's 44.39% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- -18.44%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 254.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- 44.39%
- 6M
- 45.60%
- 1Y
- 53.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 24.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
LRCU vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 270.56% | 172.36% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 44.39% | 10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and DIG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIG
LRCU vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -97.04% | +56.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -57.70% | +39.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -64.33% | +55.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.41% | 41.74% | +74.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 51.53% | +64.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 57.83% | +58.58% |
LRCU vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.72% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and DIG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.95% for DIG.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer