LRCU vs. COMB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

LRCU vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 219.61% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 25.39% return.

LRCU

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: 43.52%
• YTD: 219.61%
• 6M: 274.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 25.39%
• 6M: 24.01%
• 1Y: 37.22%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 11.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	219.61%	162.61%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	25.39%	11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and COMB is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 70
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRCU	COMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	12.64	0.51	+12.13

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-33.50%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-5.42%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.36%	-12.06%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.40%	17.07%	+92.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.40%	16.70%	+92.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.40%	15.14%	+94.26%

LRCU vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.22%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and COMB in my portfolio?

LRCU and COMB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or COMB?

On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or COMB?

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between LRCU and COMB?

LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.25% for COMB.