LRCU vs. BMNG
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
LRCU vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 145.77% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -80.92% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -35.42%
- 6M
- 48.46%
- YTD
- 145.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -84.80%
- YTD
- -80.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 145.77% | 21.10% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -80.92% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and BMNG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -50.44%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.44% | -97.32% | +46.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.44% | -96.45% | +46.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -83.42% | +72.59% |
Volatility
LRCU vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.48% | 186.10% | -62.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.48% | 186.10% | -62.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.48% | 186.10% | -62.62% |
LRCU vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and BMNG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
LRCU and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer