LQTI vs. TLTX
LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LQTI returned 4.30% vs 4.54% for TLTX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
LQTI vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.39% return.
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.24% | 4.54% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -1.39% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQTI and TLTX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQTI vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
LQTI
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQTI | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQTI vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQTI | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -6.35% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.41% | -6.35% | +2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -5.04% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -2.37% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility
LQTI vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQTI | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 9.26% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 9.26% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 9.26% | -3.34% |
LQTI vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQTI vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, less than TLTX's 17.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.20% | 7.01% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.69% | 7.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQTI and TLTX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TLTX leads with 4.54% vs 4.30% for LQTI. On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TLTX has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.69%, compared with 9.20% for LQTI.
LQTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for LQTI and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer