LQTI vs. RBLY
LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RBLY.
Performance
LQTI vs. RBLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than RBLY's -32.02% return.
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBLY
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- 20.80%
- 6M
- -31.79%
- YTD
- -32.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI vs. RBLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.24% | 3.87% |
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -32.02% | -26.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQTI and RBLY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQTI vs. RBLY — Risk / Return Rank
LQTI
RBLY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI vs. RBLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQTI | RBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQTI vs. RBLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum RBLY drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and RBLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQTI | RBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -66.96% | +63.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -56.82% | +54.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -36.21% | +35.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility
LQTI vs. RBLY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQTI | RBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 53.84% | -48.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 53.84% | -47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 53.84% | -47.92% |
LQTI vs. RBLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQTI vs. RBLY - Dividend Comparison
LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, less than RBLY's 118.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.20% | 7.01% |
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 118.97% | 36.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQTI and RBLY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.
RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 118.97%, compared with 9.20% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 0.99% for RBLY.
Find the right allocation for LQTI and RBLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer