LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L
LQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) and NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - LQQ3.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index while NASL.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQQ3.L returned 28.14%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for NASL.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LQQ3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASL.L.
Performance
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQQ3.L achieves a 56.49% return, which is significantly higher than NASL.L's 19.92% return.
LQQ3.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 27.07%
- YTD
- 56.49%
- 6M
- 51.01%
- 1Y
- 126.98%
- 3Y*
- 59.92%
- 5Y*
- 28.14%
- 10Y*
- —
NASL.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 19.92%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- —
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 56.49% | 18.96% | 62.50% | 192.06% | -77.11% | 89.86% | 102.98% | 121.83% | -29.35% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 19.92% | 11.71% | 28.78% | 47.95% | -25.38% | 29.78% | 43.43% | 33.70% | -2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQQ3.L and NASL.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between LQQ3.L and NASL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LQQ3.L
NASL.L
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQQ3.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.49 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.76 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.50 | 10.99 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQQ3.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.85 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.00 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.05 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -79.16%, which is greater than NASL.L's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ3.L and NASL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQQ3.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.16% | -27.49% | -51.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -11.08% | -24.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.39% | -24.53% | -33.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.16% | -27.49% | -51.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -0.74% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -6.14% | -17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.04% | 3.80% | +8.24% |
Volatility
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that LQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQQ3.L | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.74% | 4.15% | +9.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.87% | 10.24% | +22.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.12% | 14.63% | +30.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.25% | 19.01% | +40.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.45% | 19.90% | +39.55% |
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NASL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQQ3.L vs. NASL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LQQ3.L nor NASL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQQ3.L and NASL.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NASL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NASL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQQ3.L.
LQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index, while NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQQ3.L and 0.30% for NASL.L.
Find the right allocation for LQQ3.L and NASL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer